Talk:1969 FA Cup final

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: England / Season Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the season article task force. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Looks to me like there are as many internal links in this article as we are likely to get. As such I will

This review is

Talk:1969 FA Cup Final/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the

Disambiguations: Two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 00:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

   Well written, accords sufficiently with the Manual of Style

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

   References appear to be RS, I assume good faith for off line sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail without unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have

   suitable captions

   ):

   tagged, licensed and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   THis is definitely a good artricle, and I have no hesitation in promoting it. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100415223938/http://www.fa-cupfinals.co.uk/1969.htm to http://www.fa-cupfinals.co.uk/1969.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on