Talk:1972–73 UEFA Cup

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: Season Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the season article task force.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1972–73 UEFA Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110828054623/http://www.rsssf.com:80/ec/ec197273.html to http://www.rsssf.com/ec/ec197273.html#uefa

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As of April 2021 most of the links on the article are out of date. I've been updating the Tottenham game links as I go, it might be a good idea to convert the match report links to citations know. Govvy (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

@

WP:GNG, which requires citations, so you will have to add them all back otherwise the article is floored. Govvy (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Geregen2 (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The problem is they become somewhat less obvious as a citation that way, yes its duplication of two external links on the page. I've never really liked the way we have that added match report like that. It feels wrong somehow to me, don't know why the element can't echo as a citation. Govvy (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi All,

Sir Sputnik removed all transfermarkt links with the note "transfermarkt is not reliable". I'm ok with that statement, but my question: in this case shall all the information be removed which can be found only on transfermarkt? On this specific page: all the attendance numbers and all the referees.

Thanks,

--Simy69 (talk) 07:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information can be found on other sites like UEFA.com or 11v11.com etc, so I don't see a problem. Govvy (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see these (attendance and referee) on UEFA.com. Is 11v11.com a trusted source? I don't see any difference between 11v11.com and transfermarkt.com. I can't find any reference to their sources either. Is there a list of these trusted sources? And by the way I can't find referee info on 11v11.com.

Simy69 (talk) 12:12, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are other sources around, my Spurs books have all the attendance data for all those games. So... :/ Govvy (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is called reliability IMO. In this case the proper behavior should be referring the book with the Template:Cite book. So in other words: if I put source (transfermarkt) to those data which cannot be found on the official match report on UEFA.com and this source has been deleted because it "is not reliable" I think keeping the data (in this particular case: attendance and referee) without citing any source is against one of the basic policies of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Verifiability.

I'm really curious about Sir Sputnik's reason behind deleting transfermarkt and keeping the data. Simy69 (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]