Talk:1995 Football League Cup final

1995 Football League Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 29, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 1995 Football League Cup final appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that 1995 Football League Cup Final was their fifth League Cup victory? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1995 Football League Cup Final.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: England / Liverpool / Season Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Liverpool task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the season article task force.

This review is

Talk:1995 Football League Cup Final/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this asap. Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (

   focused

   ):

4. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have

   suitable captions

   ):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A solid article on the Football League Cup final 20 years ago. Some things left to sort out:

• Lead: two times you write about "matches" that we "close affairs", which reads pretty repetitive.
• Route to the final: For the Bolton part: You should place the citation at the end of every paragraph. Also, maybe you have sources here for the specific games?
• Route to the final: On my widescreen monitor, the two result tables intersect, leaving a lot of whitespace. You should probably move them both at the end of the section, next to each other. Even better would be if you could convert it into a table such as shown
  here
  , that would also give the opportunity to make the prose shorter. But that's optional.
• First half: You should choose a more neutral term that "dominance".
• Details: Any chance to get a source for the match rules?
• Post match: There needs to be a source for the fact that Liverpool qualified for European competition by winning the Cup.
• Optional: You might want to include how Liverpool performed in the European competition the following season.

Good job so far! On hold. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since the nominator seems to be on vacation, I was bold and made the changes myself. Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]