Talk:2002 Football League Third Division play-off final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
2002 Football League Third Division play-off Final was one of the last matches shown on the ITV Sport Channel
?
Current status: Good article

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Eddie891 (talk) 00:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the
    2002 Football League Third Division play-off Final was one of the last matches shown on the ITV Sport Channel
    ?

5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 21:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough (5x expanded right before nomination), well-sourced and neutrally written. Earwig's tool only returned direct quotes which are appropriately sourced. The hook is cited (I verifed with ref 15), neutral, and interesting. @The Rambling Man: It looks like you also used this QPQ for 1997 Football League Second Division play-off Final — can you confirm whether another one is needed? Everything else looks good! DanCherek (talk) 16:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Great! QPQ done, all else looks good to go, so approving. DanCherek (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is
Talk:2002 Football League Third Division play-off Final/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 00:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox

Route to the final

Background

Details

  • This doesn't make it clear whom Jon Brady and Brett Angell came in for, though it's not a big deal.
    "'replace Gray and Partridge" seems clear enough. If you're worried about who replaced who, you can add "respectively" but it's just replaced in the order of the prose. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 00:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, the text makes it clear. I just meant that to the extent this is treated as a stand-alone section, it's not clear—all it says is that two people came on in the 69th minute and two people came off. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Post-match

References

Usernameunique cheers, all addressed/responded to. Thanks for the review! The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 00:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, The Rambling Man. Three responses above. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Usernameunique done I think. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 09:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man, looks good. Passing now. --Usernameunique (talk) 02:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]