Talk:2002 Indianapolis 500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Indiana Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Stop the nonesense

An appeal hearing WAS held on June 17. The decision was annouced July 3rd. Stop reverting the edits with biased point of view. Tracy lost the race, in an unfortunate turn of events, no one wanted the race to end that way, but it did. Castroneves is the rightful winner. Doctorindy (talk) 02:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

I'm going to work on expanding this page...it needs it a lot. Doctorindy (talk) 02:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Identically painted cars

I reverted the edit which deleted the mention that Tracy's and Franchitti's cars were painted nearly identical. This fact is significant because it caused some of the confusion. On multiple occasions (see the notations), Franchitti was mis-identified as Tracy (because the cars looked alike). Also, it caused further confusion at the finish. When Castroneves crossed the finish line and took the checkered flag, Franchitti was immediately behind him. He was mis-identified by many as Tracy (especially on TV), mis-leading the viewers who did not know where Tracy was. No mention was ever made on TV that Tracy was actually 19 seconds ahead. Doctorindy (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't know that. Now I agree that the text is relevant. But then you should add to the article what you explained to me here, or readers will feel the same I did before. Good bye! --NaBUru38 (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I don't think it was made clear enough in the mention in the first paragraph. It isn't made clear until further down. I'll take a look at adding some more clarity. Thanks. Doctorindy (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 09:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 09:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 09:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 01:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2002 Indianapolis 500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]