Talk:2007 PGA Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Past Champions In Field

Would it make more since to list most recent to most distant? On the assumption that a) people who one more recently are more likely to win again; b) that usually a main focus of a sporting event is whether the defending champion will win. (Happyax 13:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I honestly don't see how this section is relevant in the first place for an encyclopedia article on the current event. --ZimZalaBim talk 13:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitations

The

Official World Golf Rankings
are obviously important. Possible categories:

  • Top 100 in OWGR as of July 29, 2007 [1]

Liang Wen-Chong (93), Markus Brier (94), Nathan Green (97), Kenny Perry (98), Søren Hansen (99), Anthony Wall
(100)

Nick Dougherty (100)

  • Top 100 in OWGR as of July 15, 2007 [3]

Camilo Villegas (99), Thongchai Jaidee (100)

  • Top 20 on
    European Tour Order of Merit as of July 29, 2007 [4]

Grégory Havret, Graeme Storm (only players in top 20 not otherwise eligible)

  • Previous winners at host course

The Tour Championship

  • Players eligible in 2006 but who didn’t play

Darren Clarke, Paul McGinley (death of Clarke's wife) [5]

  • Unknown

Justin Leonard, Corey Pavin

Hole Averages on Thursday

I don't know what the exact average was, however, the 13th was definitely the easiest hole on Thursday.

http://www.pga.com/pgachampionship/2007/scoring/course_stats.html

(Ryan86 17:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Tiger's Injury

Dave Sittler's column in the 6/19/08 Tulsa World points out that although the public didn't know it at the time, Tiger was actually pretty badly injured (torn ACL) when he won the 2007 PGA. As Sittler puts it, "So Woods was basically playing on one leg when he won his 13th and 14th majors." "Tiger's remarkable run began at Southern Hills." I don't know if it's important enough to add this to the 2007 PGA article or not, but it certainly puts Tiger's win--on a course he'd never handled particularly well before--in an interesting new light, so maybe it is. Arxiloxos (talk) 03:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]