Talk:2008 Super League season
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Promotion
Perhaps a mention of who was promoted to Super League for 2008 in place of Salford City?--
- Done.
Updates
This article needs some serious updating: I have noticed that there have been some things added but the results section so far is incomplete. I will be able to do some of it but need some help. Thanks. 92.4.147.101 (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- On that note, is the results section really necessary? Each club has their own results section anyway. The table informs the reader just fine, you could simply add a reference inside each cell to the BBC's match report alongside the score. Ginger Warrior (talk) 11:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Ginger Warrior
- All the results are now updated. We have inconsistency between the two different results formats. While the one giving scorers etc. is undoubtedly more informative, is it really necessary? If so, the remainder of the results should be updated so they are in this format. Regarding the results table, it is undoubtedly a much more concise method of displaying the results, and would be ideal if each team played each other once - home and away - but they don't. Julianhall (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- The results could be put on a page similar to this: talk) 22:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)]
- Should we follow the Main Article? A lot of work, but something needs to be done. Julianhall (talk) 16:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)]
- I have now created talk) 22:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)]
- Good work! I'd definitely agree to merging 2008 Super League playoffs can be edited to be to an anchor in 2008 Super League season results. Agree to proposed merger. Julianhall (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)]
- Thanks! As nobody has raised an objection after a week I will go ahead with it. talk) 21:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)]
- Thanks! As nobody has raised an objection after a week I will go ahead with it.
- Good work! I'd definitely agree to merging
- I have now created
- Should we follow the
- The results could be put on a page similar to this:
- All the results are now updated. We have inconsistency between the two different results formats. While the one giving scorers etc. is undoubtedly more informative, is it really necessary? If so, the remainder of the results should be updated so they are in this format. Regarding the results table, it is undoubtedly a much more concise method of displaying the results, and would be ideal if each team played each other once - home and away - but they don't. Julianhall (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- I've fully revamped the ]
Table
Why is the table incomplete? Julianhall (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
'Teams' table
I don't agree with this being depicted as Hull KR's '2nd season'. It just isn't the case and gives a false impression that they're a new club or a club that's new to the competition. I know in some ways the English rugby league championship was re-born with Super League, but the clubs weren't re-born in 1996. This should be changed to better reflect reality unless some solid grounds can be shown that it shouldn't.--
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.superleague.co.uk/page.php?id=346
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225073744/http://www.sportbusiness.com/britsport/166556/engage-super-league-ups-tv-game to http://www.sportbusiness.com/britsport/166556/engage-super-league-ups-tv-game
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091224213456/http://www.sportbusiness.com:80/news/167413/engage-mutual-extend-super-league-sponsorship to http://www.sportbusiness.com/news/167413/engage-mutual-extend-super-league-sponsorship
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090129200447/http://superleague.co.uk:80/statistics_player.php to http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on