Talk:2008 Tampa Bay Buccaneers season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former good article nominee2008 Tampa Bay Buccaneers season was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 3, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
WikiProject iconFlorida
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
inactive
.

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Speedy fail for severe leack of references. Please

WP:CITE
your sources and then renominate the article for GA. Reviewer:
Reywas92Talk 22:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 Tampa Bay Buccaneers season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]