Talk:2010–11 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team

	2010–11 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 29, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 14, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2010–11 Ivy League season champion Harvard Crimson team was the first men's basketball team in school history to win a league championship since the Ivy League was formed in the 1956–57 season?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

College Basketball Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:2010–11 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting tired of seeing the same 5 GANs listed as the oldest unreviewed ones, so I'll give this article a look through shortly. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

• Ref #31 on Forbes is a deadlink, but since all the info's there the url can just be removed.
  • How do we know it was in the print edition. Surely there was a story about Harvard, but it is not clear to me that all these facts were included although they probably were.--
    WP:FOUR) 05:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• "participated in the NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament since the 1946 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament." can probably be shrunk to just 1946 tournament at the end so it doesn't feel repetitive.
  • O.K.--
    WP:FOUR) 04:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• "The Colorado victory was the teams" the teams'
  • Fixed.--
    WP:FOUR) 04:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• "The Harvard gameplan involved a fast breaks initiated by its defensive" involved fast breaks..its defense
  • Fixed.--
    WP:FOUR) 04:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Adding in a few dates for when they played the tough teams may be helpful (i.e. were they all in the first couple weeks, right before conference play, or spread out?). Having summaries of all 30 games would be nice, but even I admit that's likely overkill, so that's not needed.
  • Dates added. For a power conference team or a true national contender (like say Butler), that might be a reasonable request. I don't think many readers want to slog through the average Ivy League schedule although it is probably easily sourced. For an FA of this topic that would be a must though.--
    WP:FOUR) 04:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]

I'll put the article and hold and will pass it when this is done. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks good now, so I'll pass it as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]