Talk:2010 Colombia–Venezuela diplomatic crisis

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Latin America: Colombia / Venezuela C‑class Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Colombia (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Venezuela (assessed as Mid-importance).

hey, isn't the map wrong? the countries' colours are switched compared to the legend of the map. Prysewhert (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can a military conflict infobox be psoted here? bearing in mind conflicts dont have to be physical and involve casualties, this was still a conflict. (as was the Andean crisis)Lihaas (talk) 13:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the clue's in the name, Lihaas! diplomatic crisis. Rd232 ^talk 14:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its easier navigation, and we dotn have an infobox otherwise. Its still a conflict just because we at wikipedia called it that.(Lihaas (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

We don't have to have an infobox. Infoboxes can create definitional problems, and we can easily avoid them by not having them when there's no pressing need. What navigation would be available in the infobox that isn't available in the article? Anyway, if we were going to have an infobox, it should be one specific to diplomatic crises, which doesn't currently exist. Rd232 ^talk 14:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For easy, quick review.(Lihaas (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

That's not really answering the question. The lead is supposed to perform the "quick review" function. I don't understand what you want to have in the infobox that is going to both valuable and not disputable. Rd232 ^talk 18:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100808/wl_afp/venezuelacolombiaguerillaspolitics_20100808183646
  • In
    Foreign policy of the Hugo Chávez government
    on 2011-03-19 09:46:26, 404 Not Found
  • In 2010 Colombia–Venezuela diplomatic crisis on 2011-06-18 12:07:49, 404 Not Found

--

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 9 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Freyand, Junior390, Lobham, Kanye Wapol (article contribs). Peer reviewers: RollConts, Grumpydino, Sizzle-Tonk, LBraverman30, Dcj800, 745234R5, Latinamericanguy, Ricklizard67.

— Assignment last updated by Heatvan (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Junior390 added a full intro section to the article. This section goes into detail regarding the relationship history between Venezuela and Colombia, and gives more background surrounding how things got to the point they got to during the 2010 diplomatic crisis.

Junior390 also added further details in the Reconciliation section, highlighting the role of Hugo Chavez and commenting on the fact that while there was "reconciliation", a lot of details remained unknown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junior390 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]