Talk:2010 East–West Shrine Game
East-West Shrine Games ? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 East–West Shrine Game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: –Grondemar 18:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Note: I moved the article to
]As far as I can tell, this is the first collegiate all-star game to be submitted as a good article candidate, so there are no direct examples it can be compared to. I reviewed the GA bowl game articles as well as other examples of GA all-star games (2007 Major League Baseball All-Star Game, 2009 NBA All-Star Game) as references.
I have the following concerns that need to be addressed before I will pass this article as a good article:
There should be a "Team selection" section describing why these players were selected to play in the game. What is the criteria for section, and who makes the decision as to who is invited? What factors cause a player to decide between playing in this game and the other post-season all-star games (theTexas vs the Nationgame)?- There is no information on the official website about player nominations or a selection committee. As recently as 2003, there was a reference in the press to a "East-West Shrine Game Player Selection Committee", but I can not find anything more recent and do not know if such a committee continues to be the primary or only selection process.--WP:FOUR) 05:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)]
- I also note that I see no evidence of a fan (internet) ballot for the all-star game.--WP:FOUR) 05:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)]
- My perception is that the premier game is the Senior Bowl. This is number 2. If you can't get in one of these then the Texas game is an acceptable game to appear in. I have no WP:FOUR) 05:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)]
- OK, I agree it makes more sense to put this information in the main ]
- There is no information on the official website about player nominations or a selection committee. As recently as 2003, there was a reference in the press to a "East-West Shrine Game Player Selection Committee", but I can not find anything more recent and do not know if such a committee continues to be the primary or only selection process.--
Thelead sectionneeds to be rewritten to be more of a summary of the article. Right now it contains details that aren't discussed in the rest of the article, and doesn't summarize what happened in the game.- There should be an "Aftermath" section describing what happened to these players following the game. Presumably they played in the game in order to improve their 2010 NFL Drafthappens, but there should be some sourced speculation at least.)
- In order to have a substantive aftermath section, we could put this evaluation on hold until after the April 22 draft.--WP:FOUR) 18:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)]
- Sounds reasonable to me. –Grondemar 01:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- This is done, I believe.--WP:FOUR) 00:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)]
- Could you add some citations to this section? I've been working on the article 2009 International Bowl; take a look at the Aftermath section there and the citations for the draft section from NFL.com. Something like that would be sufficient in my mind. –Grondemar 11:09, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- This is done, I believe.--
- Sounds reasonable to me. –Grondemar 01:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- In order to have a substantive aftermath section, we could put this evaluation on hold until after the April 22 draft.--
It would be nice to add some images of the players or coaches in the game, even if they aren't from the game itself, to make the article look less sparse.In the roster section, I think it would make sense to wikilink the positions and schools at first mention. Schools should probably be linked to the football team article rather than the general university article.
Otherwise this article looks good. I'll place it on hold waiting for a response to the above issues.
- herefor criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article will be on hold for
seven daysuntil April 29, 2010 waiting for responses to the above concerns.
- This article will be on hold for
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks. –Grondemar 16:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Other opinions
Hi, i think this review and edits done has confirmed that the article is GA ready. I support GA status.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- I was waiting for TonyTheTiger to add the CFL reference to the article. I just took care of that, so I agree and will pass the article. –Grondemar 04:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 East–West Shrine Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100117060931/http://www.shrinegame.com/coaches.shtm to http://www.shrinegame.com/coaches.shtm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)