Talk:2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Derild4921 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Back again! Seeing how this is a very old nominee I'll review this now. Derild4921 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't even recongnize that I had another up for review. Humm?
Nascar1996 22:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Well, it's from 2 months ago. lol. Derild4921 22:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think I need to redo most of the sources. They are from June. After this race, I really improved my writing skills.
Nascar1996 22:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Yeah, this doesn't look as well written as your other GA's. Derild4921 22:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will not be as active as I normally am. I am busy tomorrow, while being sick.
Nascar1996 23:21, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
No problem. Looks like NSD will help along here. Derild4921 00:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Count me in :). Airplaneman 13:40, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'll be out today for a soccer tournament. I'll be one tomorrow. Derild4921 16:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In depth review

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
The race summary section uses the phrases On lap # and By lap # a lot; try cutting those down.
There are too many, I do not have enough tiime to completely reword it like the newer articles, but I'll see what I can do.
Nascar1996 00:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
I cut down some, how is it now?
Nascar1996 00:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
It looks better now and I took some time to change a few others. Derild4921 18:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
This is broken. It is right now ref 12. Find an alternative please.
I have replaced that link. ~
NerdyScienceDude 03:40, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
Basing off the other article this needs Background and Post-Race sections.
 Done --
Nascar1996 20:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Also, add a "Standings after the race" section if there are any sources for this. Derild4921 18:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
Nascar1996 19:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Ref please. After I read through the article one more time, we should be done! Derild4921 21:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
Nascar1996 22:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
  1. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:


  1. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Congrats! I have passed the article! Derild4921 23:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from other editors

  • In the lead, it says claim his fourth win of the season for Hamlin in paragraph 2, yet in paragraph 3, it says Hamlin's fifth win of the season. Which is it? Either way, I would remove one of the mentions (I'd go for removing the one in paragraph 3) as they are redundant. Airplaneman 02:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Checklinks reveals one dead link, which I have tagged. Airplaneman 03:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Nascar1996 12:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]