Talk:2010 Korean Grand Prix

2010 Korean Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 15, 2015. (Reviewed version).

2010 Korean Grand Prix received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Formula One Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information. View the task list Discuss the project Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hey guys,

The circuit map needs to be re-drawn. There have been some major changes in its construction since the last map was put up. I'd do it myself, but I'm hopeless at Photoshop; I can barely manage MS Paint. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 02:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A map of the newly designed circuit has been put up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linkyblinky (talk • contribs) 06:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:2010 Korean Grand Prix/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 05:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to review this. I will be on vacation until the 12th. I'm taking a printed out version of the article with me so that I'll be able to give you my thoughts as soon as I get back. Zwerg Nase (talk) 05:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (

   focused

   ):

4. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have

   suitable captions

   ):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A very good article on this race. I made some minor changes myself. What's left is very little:

• Lead: I feel that the sentence '#In the World Constructors' Championship, Red Bull retained their lead but were reduced by McLaren, who were thirty-five points behind. sounds weird. Can Red Bull be reduced? It rather is the lead isn't it?

Reworded

• After the race: Post-race is the more conventional way to name this section, I believe.

 Done

• Optionally, you might think about bolding the names of teams and drivers still able to take the title in the standings after the race section.

 Done

So much from me. Cheers, Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Zwerg Nase: I believe I have dealt with the issues raised. Thank you for the review. Z105space (talk) 07:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed you have! Congrats, it a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]