Talk:2010 U.S. Open Cup qualification

Football: American & Canadian / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Full team names

I think we should list teams in the bracket and the articles using their full team names. That's the way it has been done in other years, that's the way it has been done in other soccer articles, that's the way it is done in MLS articles. If you think we should only list city names, that's fine, but you need to justify your opinions. -- Grant .Alpaugh 19:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say using the full team name in the brackets would be redundant after the first round in each bracket (and barring two similarly named teams or teams from the same area competing), however if will make the brackets consistent with other brackets within the American format, then it should be done. Mtndrums (talk) 18:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that using it on the bracket is redundant since the scores are also below and show the full club's name. I think in the brackets we can just put the city name and below full names. La Fuzion (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on

2010 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ

for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]