Talk:2015 Football League One play-off final

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[hat-trick#Associatio football|hat-trick]] Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This review is

Talk:2015 Football League One play-off Final/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: EchetusXe (talk · contribs) 06:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( lists ): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism ): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions ):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• I have made changes that I saw were needed myself. Added a couple 'what happened next' for the man of the match and Swindon manager. Cleared up the EFL / Football League name consistency issues, just removing them both from the equation.

• Not sure how the images became free to use but well done to whoever got the permission for them on here.

• It's a pretty simple article, on one singular match, so not much else to say. Well done!--EchetusXe 06:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]