Talk:2015 Giro d'Italia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Orphaned references in 2015 Giro d'Italia

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2015 Giro d'Italia's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "demystified":

  • From Cima Coppi: Laura Weislo (13 May 2008). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 13 July 2013.
  • From 1999 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo (13 May 2008). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on 17 June 2014. Retrieved 13 July 2013. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • From 2006 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo and Tim Maloney (2007-05-18). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Archived from the original on 8 January 2010. Retrieved 2009-12-01. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • From 2008 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo (2008-05-13). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on 13 July 2014. Retrieved 2009-08-27. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 8 May 2013 suggested (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • From 2014 Giro d'Italia: Laura, Weislo (13 May 2008). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. Retrieved 27 August 2009.
  • From 1983 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo (2008-05-13). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2009-08-27.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 21:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Glad to review this. Expect my reviews around Tuesday/Wednesday :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (
    lists
    )
    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (
    focused
    )
    :
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I changed Sanremo to San Remo to make it consistent with the mention of Milan - San Remo in the article. I hope that's OK. Things that should be looked into:

That's it really. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Zwerg Nase, for your review and edits. I'm a bit in two minds about Sanremo, but I've no objection to "San Remo". Wikipedia isn't consistent on the question. I've replied to your other points above: do take a look and see if you're satisfied! Relentlessly (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All done, another pass, congrats :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]