Talk:2015 Liège–Bastogne–Liège

2015 Liège–Bastogne–Liège has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 19, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cycling Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Belgium Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Dan Martin broken ribs

Relentlessly (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:2015 Liège–Bastogne–Liège/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On it. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (

   focused

   ):

4. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have

   suitable captions

   ):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Some minor things:

• Background: In the first sentence, I think established would be a better term.

Oh, that's it. Made some more minor changes myself.

Good edits, thanks. I've moved the images back up a bit, though, because they were dropping down into the section below on very wide screens. I've also made all the many changes listed above! Thanks as ever, ZN. Relentlessly (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, as always! Pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]