Talk:2016 24 Hours of Daytona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on January 16, 2020.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 24 Hours of Daytona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 24 Hours of Daytona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Expanded well over fivefold on 7 January, long enough, well referenced, with no copyvio hits on Earwig. The original hook is interesting and cited (I changed "be" to "finish" as "saw two cars be" sounds very unnatural to me). The hook could also be tightened by dropping "in first and second places" as this is implied. I suggest not running the ALT1 hook because as someone unfamiliar with motorsport I don't exactly understand what it means or why it's significant, and the hook doesn't entice me to click the link to find out. QPQ is done. 97198 (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello MWright96, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you in some time. I hope you will find my feedback to be helpful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    MWright96, good work on the article, I've completed the review and could not find any significant issues. There are two minor ones which I have mentioned in the comments but otherwise this is more or less a good article so I've promoted it. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • "It was the third consecutive year it was part of the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and the 54th 24 Hours of Daytona." This line should have an inline citation.
  • Since the information in the image caption under "Entry list" is not present in the article, the caption itself should have an inline citation.

Assessment

  1. Comprehension: The article is very well written.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is clear, concise and understandable. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability:The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and inline citation in the body, some minor issues exist. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used appear to be largely reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright violation or plagiarism found, note earwig's brings a number of false positive due to the names. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused without any unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No ongoing edit warring or content disputes exist. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Images used are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use and captions are appropriate and illustrative. Pass Pass