Talk:2016 FINA Women's Water Polo World League

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's sport Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Swimming Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Water polo work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Personally I think the hasissues tag is added without good reason. This is a page about an ongoing sportevent, just like hunderds of others. The text is taken from last year's edition and verified with the 2016 rules and that page does not have any issues. And because the page only has one source, it is automatically an issue? If it was a dubious source, I could understand, but the official rulebook of this event is the most trustworthy source that is possible to find. If it is really a big issue, the tag should also be added to each previous edition of this event. --Kevin1109 (talk) 10:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]