Talk:2018 Milan–San Remo

2018 Milan–San Remo has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 3, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Cycling Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:2018 Milan–San Remo/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr.robin (talk · contribs) 09:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work, as always. Obviously a good article. Dr.robin (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thank you for the kind words. Is that the entire review? Usually, some problems should be stated. However, if you want to instantly promote the article, you have to go through the rest of the steps. Best regards! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zwerg Nase and Dr.robin: Great to see a new GAN reviewer! I just wanted to point out one thing before this article is passed. The last sentence of the first paragraph in the "Pre-race favourites" section is unreferenced. A reference needs to be included, otherwise it is considered original research.--Dom497 (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dom497: Thank you, I'll take care of it on Sunday! Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dom497: Done. Someone else had added a paragraph break there, taken care of now. @Dr.robin: Do you want to close the review? Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Earth to @Dr.robin: ;-) Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zwerg Nase: Dr.robin to ground control. For all my edits, I feel I'm still just getting the hang of Wikipedia :). My first time on the nomination page and I have no idea of how to close the review. Help (!) Dr.robin (talk) 12:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr.robin: You can find all the infos here :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr.robin: If you need any more help closing the review, please contact me. I would like to see this review closed as soon as possible :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dom497: The original reviewer does not seem to be able to close this review. Would you agree to do so? Obviously, only if you feel that the article meets the GA standards. Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zwerg Nase: I'll pass it based on the fact that Dr.robin has indicated that they want to pass the nomination (I have not fully reviewed the article so I can't "endorse" it). However, I will ping @Dr.robin: one more time. If Dr.robin continues to make edits after the ping goes through I'll then pass the nomination.--Dom497 (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dom497: Thank you! Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Passing on the behalf of Dr.robin.--Dom497 (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]