Talk:2018 Pacific hurricane season/GA1
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 07:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Immediate Failures
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
-It contains copyright infringements
-It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).
-It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.
-
Links
Prose
Lede
- Short description? The one on Wikidata is huge! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Could we fix the first sentence? It doesn't actually say what the article is about Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- What would you suggest? This is similar to other season articles. See 2005 Atlantic hurricane season and 2006 Pacific hurricane season as examples. NoahTalk 16:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Does "most-active" mean most named storms? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- (Bud, Olivia, Nineteen-E, Rosa, Walaka, Sergio, Vicente, and Willa) - seems like general prose info. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- The season officially began on May 15 in the eastern Pacific, and on June 1 in the central Pacific; they both ended on November 30 - this is cited - can we cite in body instead? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Have we got a link for Category 5? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
General
- Might need to come up with a better style for the subsections in "systems" (maybe by location or month), and use {{TOC limit}}. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- I feel the article (like the lead) is missing a senetnce/paragraph about what the article is about. We can't just expect readers to know what we are talking about from the title. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- near- to above-average season - is this a quote? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (lists):
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a ():
- a ():
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review meta comments
- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)]