Talk:2019 Riga Masters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article2019 Riga Masters has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2019 Riga Masters is part of the 2019–20 snooker season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 19, 2019Good article nomineeListed
October 13, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 7, 2019.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that several entrants in the 2019 Riga Masters professional snooker event—including the defending champion—missed the tournament because their flights were cancelled?
Current status: Good article
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 13:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Lee Vilenski (talk) and Piotras18 (talk). Nominated by Lee Vilenski (talk) at 15:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Lee Vilenski: This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. So we are just waiting for the QPQ to be done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cwmhiraeth, I knew I had missed one - done. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:30, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. Good to go (I like the original hook best). Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "2019 Riga Masters" vs "2019 Kaspersky Riga Masters" vs "2019 Kaspersky Lab"... needs alignment and consistency (and explanation).
  • "withdraw from qualifying round matches " well, I guess it's worth noting they therefore could participate at all.
  • " Arēna Rīga " is not mentioned outside the lead/infobox.
  • WPBSA as organisers isn't mentioned outside the infobox.
  • Mention highest break in the lead per other such articles.
  • Check other recent GAs, lead is a little light, do we include prize money? Definitely need to include Kaspersky (Lab) explanation there too.
  • " The event had no top-20 players reach the quarter-finals." -> "No players from the top 20 in the world reached the quarter-finals"?
  • Reverse first two sentences of Format.
  • "where matches played " were.
  • No need to relink Joyce in the second image caption (or even repeat his first name I suppose).
  • Link World Snooker. And if it was organised by WPBSA, what does World Snooker have to do with it?
    •  Question: WPBSA are the governing body, whilst World Snooker are the administrative arm for snooker. I have no idea which of these would be considered the official "organiser". I actually thought it was just a re-branding to be honest, but they are two legally different companies. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The round of 64 match" -> "The round-of-64 match"
  • "was not held due to both players" replace "due to" with "as"
  • "a second-round bye." I've always preferred to reduce ambiguity, do you mean "a bye into the second round" or "a bye into the third round"?
  • "2018 runner-up Jack..." avoid starting with a number.
  • "before losing to Mark Joyce." ref?
  • "After the round of 16, all eight players remaining had world rankings below 20." weird phrasing. "No player qualifying for the quarter-finals was ranked in the top 20 in the world" or similar?
  • ", the final day of the event." self-explanatory if the final was played that day.
  • " thus reaching " no need for thus.
  • "missed a routine yellow," somewhat POV to describe a yellow as "routine", if it's a quote, quote it.
  • "Neither played made " player.
  • "awarding Yan enough penalty points to win the frame." what new rule is this??
  • "with breaks of 50 or higher" no break was made of 50...
  • "Certain players had " just say how many!
    •  Not done I can't. There's some ambiguity as to if Duane Jones and Harvey Chandler missed the event due to flight issues, or other reasons. [7] Sources just say "certain players" or, because of the "amount of players". There were 15 withdrawals in the competition, but I can't say how many were due to the flight complications. Robertson said "about 10". Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Probably need w/d and w/o explained.
  • Flags in the Main draw section!!
  • Referee Tatiana should be mentioned in the prose, not just the summary table.
  • "Arēna Rīga" in the summary table is redirect, the other versions in the article aren't redirects (it's the diacritics).
  • Qualifying in England should be mentioned in the lead.
  • Replace spaced hyphens in the ref titles with spaced en-dashes.

That's it from me, on hold. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:06, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Three things outstanding, rest is done. Thanks for your help TRM. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All good, happy to promote now. I made a minor change (the sponsorship was covered twice in consecutive sentences with different names!), but otherwise I'm happy with all the above. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]