Talk:2019 World Cup (snooker)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article2019 World Cup (snooker) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2019 World Cup (snooker) is part of the 2019–20 snooker season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 13, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 05:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


WP:WIAGA
for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the
    list incorporation
    :
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
    the layout style guideline
    :
    B. All
    reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
    :
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it
    neutral
    ?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
    edit war
    or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are
    copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
    :
    B. Images are
    suitable captions
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Didn't find any other issues. Passed.

Comments

❯❯❯   S A H A 20:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ArnabSaha, thanks for the review, I've covered the above points. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats ❯❯❯   S A H A 20:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]