Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF second round

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 17 September 2019 by reviewer Smartyllama (talk · contribs). Football: Africa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the African football task force (assessed as Low-importance). Africa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is there a particular reason that all the MD5 fixtures that appear on Soccerway have been deleted. I know I find it annoying when people don't reference these things, but Soccerway's info has been 95%+ accurate for MDs 1-4 (and have tended to be more accurate than CAF's page!!) 110.33.28.251 (talk) 11:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been restored. Seems like the Goat vandal found their way to this article, but I don’t know why an administrator would think the Soccerway info is part of the collateral damage. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the times for 12 November were amended by CAF/FIFA and updating the page is blocked by someone who doesn't know better. BFA v NIG - 14:00 UTC +1, DJI v ALG - 15:00 UTC +2, GAB v LBY - 17:00 UTC+1. 110.33.28.251 (talk) 12:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to the "doesn't know better" comment, again, the Jakarta Goat vandal has started targeting this page and protection was necessary to stop the vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An IP on

I think it is definitely worth at least a note in the match box. If FIFA decides to change the match results at all, whether invalidating and ordering a rematch or awarding to RSA, then it should definitely go into the prose. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 23:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the note regarding alleged match fixing, I also added one to the 14 November COD–BEN match regarding an alleged violation of the substitution rules. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 02:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

change The second round saw the top 26 ranked CAF teams joined by the 14 winners from the first round. These teams were drawn into ten groups of four teams to play home-and-away round-robin matches. The winners of each group advanced to the third round. to

The second round saw the top 40 ranked CAF teams were drawn into ten groups of four teams to play home-and-away round-robin matches. The winners of each group advanced to the third round. IslamElbadawy (talk) 08:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: Needs reliable sources - feel free to make another request when you have some. Zippybonzo | talk 16:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]