Talk:4733d Air Defense Group

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / Cold War Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

This unit's mission was entirely devoted to the detection, warning, and control mission. It had no flying units assigned. It seems to me that if the page is retained, it should be removed from WPAVIATION Lineagegeek (talk) 20:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is contained in the article is about all non-trivial that can be said about the units. I doubt this can ever get beyond a stub, no matter how well-written or sourced it is (technically, it meets the criteria for a B-Class article now). I would suggest merging this with the 64th Air Division page and making this page a Redirect with categories retained for the category pages appearance. Lineagegeek (talk) 20:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]