Talk:5th G7 summit
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EU participation
There is a slow-motion edit war about one aspect of 5th G7 summit.
Collapsed argument and details
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning with the WP:V seems relevant because "the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth — whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."
A slow-motion edit war is worrisome; but discussion can be constructive -- see Muskoka 2010: G8 members The edit history of 36th G8 summit records an unhelpful pattern:
The same pattern is seen at 37th G8 summit:
|
This thread may help resolve the issues, or it may help bring clearer focus. --
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 5th G7 summit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100603074840/http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0327_global_governance_rieffel.aspx to http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0327_global_governance_rieffel.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100603074840/http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0327_global_governance_rieffel.aspx to http://g8.gc.ca/about/member-states/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070226165606/http://www.deljpn.ec.europa.eu/union/showpage_en_union.external.g8.php to http://www.deljpn.ec.europa.eu/union/showpage_en_union.external.g8.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)