Talk:64K intro

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

project's importance scale

.

Visual arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Intro vs Demo

Why is it called 64k intros and not 64k demos. Any ideas? --Simon Strandgaard (talk) 23:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Before they became a de-facto standard, intros were usually just small introduction screens before the cracked program // Gargaj (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
emphasis on coder should be mentioned

What is the magic behind creating a 64k intro

I think that this page needs a section about how one creates a 64k intro. the tools used (opengl, directx, v2, kkrunchy), the technics used. Not sure if sdl is used? (Simon Strandgaard 14:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

There are a couple of articles though i'm not sure of the notability // Gargaj (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution

the first 64k intros, the move to 3d, hardware acceleration, where are we now? (Simon Strandgaard 14:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Requested move 28 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Treating this as an uncontested technical request. – Wbm1058 (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Reply to}} Vivil 🗪 02:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Video requested

This documentation could benefit from a screencast to explain the topic in an easily accessible way. See WikiProject Screencast for additional information.