Talk:6th King Edward's Own Cavalry
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 6th King Edward's Own Cavalry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
6th Prince of Wales's Cavalry → 6th King Edward’s Own Cavalry – The new name is the last name this regiment was known by which is even mentioned in the article. This link shows the correct name etc [1]. Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
]
- Oppose. No evidence supporting the move in terms of WP:AT. The article is so stubby that a move is at least premature. See also WP:official names if the policy at WP:AT needs explanation. Andrewa (talk) 15:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)]
- I think the evidence is that the vast majority of article links point to the 6th King Edward’s Own Cavalry and not the 6th Prince of Wales.Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.