Talk:A Sky Full of Stars
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Sky Full of Stars article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spotify release
The single has been released on Spotify with a slightly altered cover: link (login required, eg. Facebook account). Mayast (talk) 14:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Lead section & single release
@
- I was simply being faithful that there would be a single release of "A Sky Full of Stars". There was only the iTunes track release at the time, so this put the article in an awkward position of whether or not it should be relegated to a song, despite such an enormous influx of the track being described as a single. Today, however, it's been put up on Google Play, so crisis averted, I guess! :)
- RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 01:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)]
- Good to know :) I can accept 5 May 2014 as the release date in the infobox, however, I moved the information about this iTunes release to a "Release" section, as it's important and shouldn't be removed from the article completely – based on the reported sales, we can expect the song to chart in several countries on iTunes sales alone. I put the information about Google Play as well, but as it's not available in Poland yet, I wasn't able to reference it correctly – could you do that? — Mayast (talk) 08:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- It would be easier to move the information itself to the lead, actually, and as for the Google Play reference, it was already done in the release history!
- RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 08:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)]
- Actually, release history section isn't necessary when there is only one release date, plus lead section needs to follow the body of the article. And I think that when someone was reviewing "Atlas" article for B-class, they commented that "Charts" section with a table wasn't enough, and the article needed to have the chart positions discussed in a "Commercial performance" section as well. So, I think we need a section with these release dates in text, I could also add the Spotify release there. — Mayast (talk) 08:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)]
- Actually, release history section isn't necessary when there is only one release date, plus
- Good to know :) I can accept 5 May 2014 as the release date in the infobox, however, I moved the information about this iTunes release to a "Release" section, as it's important and shouldn't be removed from the article completely – based on the reported sales, we can expect the song to chart in several countries on iTunes sales alone. I put the information about Google Play as well, but as it's not available in Poland yet, I wasn't able to reference it correctly – could you do that? — Mayast (talk) 08:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Hardwell Remix
Hi! Coldplay released (on spotify) an official remix of the song realized by Hardwell... So I think we could add it at the end of the page (like Giorgio Moroder Remix for the Midnight page) what do you think about it? ;) (^_^)FilBenLeafBoy(^_^)(Let's TALK!) — Preceding undated comment added 12:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Official remix? Then there should be something from the Coldplay camp about this. That needs to be added if there is, otherwise it needs to be removed. Karst (talk) 10:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on A Sky Full of Stars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150721184429/http://www.billboard.com.br/tipo_lista/top-100/20140621/ to http://www.billboard.com.br/tipo_lista/top-100/20140621/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fimi.it/classifiche_digital.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150113005101/http://www.fimi.it/5233 to http://www.fimi.it/5233
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allaccess.com/triple-a/future-releases
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allaccess.com/top40-mainstream/future-releases
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)