Talk:Absolute Justice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Smallville: Absolute Justice?

Since it was promoted as Smallville:Absolute Justice, why not make that the title? If not that, why not have the article be named Absolute Justice (Smallville)?ChaosMaster16 (talk) 20:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)ChaosMaster16[reply]

It may have been promoted as "Smallville: Absolute Justice", but when it's ever been referred to in official listings it's always simply "Absolute Justice". From Xbox Live to MSN to TV Guide. As for as titling it "Absolute Justice (Smallville)", that doesn't follow the TV naming conventions. Right now, there is nothing else that shares the title exactly. There is the Justice comic book that was loosely associated to the term "Absolute", but it didn't go by that name. The same with One Piece. Thus, we only disambiguate when we share a title, and right now nothing shares this title, so we can have it all to ourselves.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 00:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery men

Coincidence or reference to the film Mystery Men? They do say the phrase an awful lot during the episode. -- Horkana (talk) 05:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a common term that's been used a lot in the comics. So not really a reference there. DonQuixote (talk) 12:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

APOKOLIPS

Why is there no mention in the article about Amanda Waller stating "we're going to need them to survive the apokolips that's coming this way"? This is clearly a reference to Darkseid. It has also been confirmed by Geoff Johns "Capital A and a K". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.245.32.210 (talk) 14:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a minor statement that isn't supported by reliable sources. Where did Geoff Johns say that Apokolips or Darkseid were coming to Smallville?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 14:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1 or 2 episode(s)

Mentioning it here as well,

Talk:Smallville (season 9)#Absolute Justice. Thanks. Xeworlebi (tc) 09:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Article Reassessment

I think this article could be reassessed, and if its not ready for that, we could work on improving it. ChaosMasterChat 02:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Absolute Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Absolute Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]