Talk:Adil Shahi dynasty

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Karnataka / History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance). project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

After visiting pages of Delhi sultanate and Bahmani Sultanate, I had seen some space in Deccan Sultanates and this page. So I added info box containing former countries. Hope readers made appreciate. Muhammad Aslam Razvi

IN the interests of a complete survey of Bijapur, I would suggest more data be added on the impact of the Portuguese arrival in India, and the struggle over Goa. We know that Bijapur was deeply involved in both diplomatic and trade relations with the Portuguese from 1510 CE on. 98.193.56.181 (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have just added below mentioned articles relating to different sections of Adilshahis of Bijapur.

2 Sufis of Bijapur

3 Bijapur; The Great Metropolis Of The Medieval Deccan

4 Palmyra of the Deccan

5 Population and Suburbs

6 Elaborate Water System

7 Bazaars and Petes

8 Foreign Accounts

9 Gardens and Water Pavilions

10 Education and Learning

11 Medical Aids and Darush-Shafa (Hospitals)

12 Abode of Music

13 Unprecedented Art and Architecture

14 Conclusion

15 Adil Shahi arts and heritage

16 Adil Shahis of Bijapur

I feel it is my job to provide maximum of information about Bijapur city. Muhammad Aslam Razvi

I appreciate your additions to the Adil Shahi page, but feel that you have added far too many materials that really are not directly pertinent to the history of the Adil Shahi per se, but to the city of Bijapur in general. I would like to recommend that these sections all be moved to the wiki article about Bijapur.

  1. 2 Sufis of Bijapur
  2. 3 Some of the notable Sufis of Bijapur
  3. 4 Bijapur; The Great Metropolis Of The Medieval Deccan
  4. 5 Palmyra of the Deccan
  5. 6 Population and Suburbs
  6. 7 Elaborate Water System
  7. 8 Bazaars and Petes
  8. 9 Foreign Accounts
  9. 10 Gardens and Water Pavilions
 10. 11 Education and Learning
 11. 12 Medical Aids and Darush-Shafa (Hospitals)
 12. 13 Abode of Music
 13. 14 Unprecedented Art and Architecture
 14. 15 Conclusion

The article about the Adil Shahi should contain specific, primary information about the that dynasty, nothing else. If you would like to go back and add specific information related to each ruler, that would be acceptable.Jemiljan (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some observations and references made by the scholar T.N. Devare that greatly clarifies and enhances our understanding of Yusuf Adil Shah, and provides clear proof that contradicts the fictitious, albeit very popular account by Firishta of of Yusuf's Ottoman origins.--Jemiljan 21:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Sultan Ibrahim Adil Shah II.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sultan Ibrahim Adil Shah II.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- talk) 14:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Böri (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

can someone help me whit reference! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.191.74 (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any comments on this edit? Can someone comment on what is going on, or provide a source for the information? User:Moinkm5, you'll receive a notification of this discussion. Thanks. Skittle (talk) 11:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was not always Shiya Muslims, it changed often, but finally sunni islam was the state religion in the family.

as you can see by the different shahs... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.105.20 (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source? --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Source is here under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibrahim_Adil_Shah_II

Under Religion you see: Shia till 1552 and accepted SunniIslam in the hands of Shah Sibghatullah Shuttari and Sunnism became the official religion of Bijapur Adil Shahi Dynasty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.105.20 (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see no source supporting this information. Anyone could have added anything to the religion section of the template. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:37, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--88.233.7.216 (talk) 01:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC) Was A Turk[reply]

https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=-BB-CwAAQBAJ&pg=PT633&dq=Adil+Shahi+dynasty+origin&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFndDhhszNAhVKB8AKHcInBZUQ6AEITjAH#v=onepage&q=Adil%20Shahi%20dynasty%20origin&f=false

That does not appear to be a reliable source. --Kansas Bear (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question: What does “Palmyra of the Deccan” mean?

I've been to Palmyra, the desert city in Syria with its half Roman, half pre-Islamic Arab ruins, back in 1992. It also was famous in that the ancient temples resembled the more ancient Jewish temple of Jerusalem (destroyed by the Romans in AD 70). Most of the ruins were destroyed in the Syria war later on. Palmyra also was infamous for its prison, where the Asads kept most of their political prisoners.

But Palmyra as a symbol for a multicultural society that supported poets freely is entirely alien to me. Where do you have that from? Greetings, Curryfranke (talk) 13:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out. Not only is the grammar somewhat incomprehensible, the source cannot be verified and is not even properly cited. Removed. 50.111.52.253 (talk) 03:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting it! --Curryfranke (talk) 11:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What does 'some of them attained high order' mean, exactly? Doesn't read well in English at all. Please elaborate, whomever edited. Thanks. 50.111.52.253 (talk) 03:58, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the Deccan Sultanates were all adherent of

, they all knew how to complete masterpiece artworks in just 12 colour.

21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)~[reply]