Talk:Adresseavisen
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 3, 2010. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
 | Norway | |||
| ||||
Political position
The newspaper infobox template has a field with political position. I have left it open - does anyone know? --Gosub 16:03, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- Found myself. --Gosub 16:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- I can't really say it's either conservative or leftist. It's hard to tell if you ask me. --84.202.208.245 (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Adresseavisen has always been a conservative newspaper, though during the last two decades it has chosen to publicly declare neutrality. But even as late during the 1980s the Editor-in-Chief met at the annual convention of the Conservative Party of Norway, so it is a matter of bonds and not content. Arsenikk (talk) 17:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)]
- Adresseavisen has always been a conservative newspaper, though during the last two decades it has chosen to publicly declare neutrality. But even as late during the 1980s the Editor-in-Chief met at the annual convention of the
- I can't really say it's either conservative or leftist. It's hard to tell if you ask me. --84.202.208.245 (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adresseavisen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150128115021/http://www.ccieurope.com/References/References/Customer_Cases/Adresseavisen.aspx to http://www.ccieurope.com/References/References/Customer_Cases/Adresseavisen.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
{{source check- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 27 June 2017 (UTC)