Talk:Agent Carter (film)

Agent Carter (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 10, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Agent Carter (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 July 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Marvel One-Shot short Agent Carter was supposed to be filmed in a pool, but could not because of the muscle suit he wore to portray Dum Dum Dugan? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agent Carter (film).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics: Marvel / Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group. This article is supported by Comic book films work group. Film: Comic book / Marvel Cinematic Universe / American This article is supported by the Comic book films task force. This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Hi @Adamstom.97,

You've reverted one of my edits and reinstated the bit about fans liking Agent Carter. I'm more familiar with articles related to video game (see

I'm pretty sure that is in reference to the first line of the reception section, which says the short was well received by the Comic Con audience. I feel that is more notable than usual given the smaller amount of reception to the short (not like one of the films, which have hundreds of critics responding to them). - adamstom97 (talk) 05:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I see. I'm not convinced that it is important enough to be mentioned in the lead though. After all, the audience at that venue was probably rather small. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The audience was during Comic-Con, which is admittedly a small portion of viewers, but still quite large. How about the sentence is rephrased as follows (or similarly): "The short was released on the home media release of Iron Man 3, and was received positively by critics and the audience from an earlier screening at Comic-Con." The goal is to have wording similar to that used in the reception section, because Comic-Con audiences are not all fans, as media is also generally in attendance. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Adamstom.97 and Favre1fan93, I just came across this discussion again, sorry about that. How do you feel, adamstom97, about Favre1fan93's proposal? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I would be fine with that. - adamstom97 (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Added - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Hayley Atwell by Gage Skidmore.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]