Talk:Airbus A319

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Time for a change

Hello everyone, I have recently updated the main image of the A319 page from a Lufthansa A319 to a US Airway A319. I changed this because I did not want people confusing the A319 and A320 pages. the new image will be a good reminder to people that this is the A319 page instead of the A320 page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:703:200:F9A:F9CC:5828:1040:D1A1 (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airbus A319. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 10:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Airbus A319. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

main photo change

  • current photo, OK but rather bland
    current photo, OK but rather bland
  • proposed photo, better illustrating the general configuration
    proposed photo, better illustrating the general configuration

--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New main pic

Hi everyone, just to leave a notice that I changed the main picture. It now illustrates BA, a common A319 operator. Also, the last pic wasn't correctly cropped according to airplane photography standards. Cheers, TramBusAl.

I have reverted it, you need to get a consensus first, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How to undo an edit

I hate being on phone all the time, you guys know how to undo an edit?

Merge

The Article should be merged with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A320_family#A319 in my opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DB:E708:1600:71B5:794E:6BD9:D8D8 (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unit conversions

There is no consensus on unit conversions. The only consensus I saw was "it's an editorial decision".--Marc Lacoste (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was enough consensus to program Template:Convert such that when nmi is entered, by default it is converted into km and mi. If you disagree with that, Template talk:Convert would be the venue to discuss that, not here.
As far back as July 25, 2016‎, this page has used the standard conversion of nmi into km and mi. You, Marc Lacoste, were the editor who changed the formatting to have km only. However, the double conversion was the original state and has existed in the intro since that time. RickyCourtney (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The convert template is generic but this is an aviation topic, where the consensus in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft/Archive_49#Units_conversion was like All units can be used. Their selection is an editorial decision.
7 years of stability is an obvious consensus. Per
wp:brd, you were bold to add sm to the convert template, you were reverted rapidly, thus this should be discussed here while leaving the article in the previous stable state. Thanks.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
A nautical mile is a unit of length only used in air, marine, and space navigation. Therefore, aviation topics are one of the three types of pages that use the nmi conversions. I've yet to hear an argument why we should be ignoring the default output other than it's what we've been doing for a long time. RickyCourtney (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Address again in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft then.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Airbus_A319&oldid=1198207793"