Talk:Airco DH.9

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War I B‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles B This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Las Anod#Diiriye Guure|Diiriye Guure]] The anchor (#Diiriye Guure) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

As the DH9 and DH9A are really different aircraft is it worth splitting this article once there is enough info? As a start I have added separate specifications for the DH9. Nigel Ish 21:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be a good idea. The book I had treated them in the same article, and so I didn't have enough information to separate them. If you feel you can though, please do! --Falcorian ^(talk) 21:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Airco DH.9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160220132202/http://contrails.iit.edu/history/Huffman/H-part06.pdf to http://contrails.iit.edu/history/Huffman/H-part06.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.britishaircraft.co.uk/aircraftpage.php?ID=572

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airco DH.9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070428004017/http://www.airspaceduxford.org.uk/html/infocus/infocus_news11.htm to http://www.airspaceduxford.org.uk/html/infocus/infocus_news11.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article mentions 1920 as the last combat use. Which can not be true since Greeks have deployed them against Turks during the Turkish War of Independence and one was captured by Turks and then used against the Greeks. Two more were captured intact in Izmir later. This was 1922.

It actually mentions 1920 as the last combat use BY THE RAF. Note that it also talks about South African combat use in 1922 and Polish use in the

Polish-Soviet War, and there may have also been combat use by other users (for example the Soviets).Nigel Ish (talk) 15:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I showed, with multiple references, that it was used in combat as late 1922. Maybe should not have said very last use, but need to check on that as the months for other engagements were not mentioned. Nothing in the statement was wrong. Are you under the impression that every sentence in a paragraph needs to end with a reference? Thank you for your attention.Murat (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Every statement should be backed by a cite - to reliable sources (and it isn't clear if either of the two sources are reliable - one of one appears to be some sort of flyer advertising a book and the parts of the other that are legible don't back up what is cited to it. You cannot rely on sources earlier in a paragraph for verification.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vecihi Hurkus is a very well know pilot, and his exploits are well documented. I did not bother to include all. In fact, his name given to a new plane that is in development now. One of the references you are referring to is actually from a website dedicated to him, maintained by his family and experts in the field. I will go over once more. Thanks again for your attention. Murat (talk) 19:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked into this Rand revolt. The conflict seems to have taken place around march 1922. This makes the use of DH.9 as late as mid-Sepetember 1922 by the Turkish Armed Forces in fighting the Greek Army as possibly one of the last use in an armed conflict.I need more details on the Polish use. Murat (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to Sanitago Rivas in British Combat Aircraft in Latin America, Peru deployed DH.9s in a campaign against rebels in 1924, carrying out armed reconnaissance missions over the rebel-held town of Chota, Peru. While they didn't engage in combat (because they didn't spot any rebels) the unopposed use of airpower was said to weaken the rebels will to resist. Nigel Ish (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]