Talk:Akshar Purushottam Upasana

Topics to be added

These are the topics in the publication through BAPS aksharpith, which could be added to this article to make it more definitive

Aspects of Akshar Purushottum Upãsanã: -Kartã (God as the all doer) -Sãkãr (God with form) -Sarvopari (God as supreme) -Pragat (God as Ever Present) -Aksharbrahman

also If anyone can please possibly cite additional references to this article

This article seems to show that BAPS are the only proponents of the Akshar Purushottam Upasana, when in fact there are others. I tried to edit the page to include these groups but my edits have been removed. Anyone know who I can talk to, to get my edits in? Jakrabbit27 (talk) 12:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the edits because I didn't feel that they were neutral. Add proposed ideas here and I will try to include them into the article myself ^The Wo rld 22:27, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restructuring

I think it would be best to create a section in which all the points of the opposition can be placed. Other articles have used this approach, and it's much more objective (i.e. in the sense that both sides of the issue are presented). Moksha88 (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

The Photo is only one part of the interpretation. In this cults buildings, they also worship the sadhus which is fundamentally against scriptures of the original cult. A photo that shows all the cult leaders being worshipped in this interpretation should be placed. The print from this site http://londonmandir.baps.org/worship/swaminarayan-theology-a-very-brief-exposition/ should be suffice.

Lord Shree Krishna, His incarnations, idols, and images alone are worthy objects for meditation. One should never meditate upon any Jiva, person, Deva (demi-gods), or deity, even if he is a profound devotee or a Brahmaveta. Verse 115 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.217.233.69 (talk) 21:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lucidity

I doubt that uninvolved persons are capable to understand what this article is actually about. Which should be the point of having it on Wikipedia. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 22:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Akshar Purushottam Upasana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy

Content accuracy can be improved, as facts stated are inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.967 (talk) 03:76, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials"

if you are.)

For

guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Akshar Purushottam Upasana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]