Talk:Albedo Anthropomorphics

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Furry Mid‑importance Albedo Anthropomorphics is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Erma Felna: EDF was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 November 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Albedo Anthropomorphics. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Man, this thing is entirely unsourced and may as well be WP:OR. Can this be fixed?-K@ngie^meep! 00:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm qualified to talk about the REFRACTIONS bit because I was the publisher. (Hi. A friend of mine pointed me over here and said, "hey, I think this is wrong." So I fixed it. ^_^ ) How do you site being your own original source, anyway? Also, I can ask Steve to take a peek over here if that's valid. Anyway, I've added a bunch of external references. Hopefully they're okay. Solarbird 16:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It all looks to be in order, though I'm sortof against using WikiFur as a source, due to it being a wiki and not reliable yada yada yada. Would it be possible to get a different source instead of wikifur? I'm very happy with it as a whole though! And on the subject of using your material to source an article, AFAIK that's fine as long as you're an

• Expert on the given subject
• Put it somewhere where it can be accessed (so the information is verifiable)

Thanks for improving the article a whole lot, though-K@ngie^meep! 02:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This essay doesn't seem too bad, as these things go:

http://www.perrirhoades.furtopia.org/Furry.html

Solarbird 23:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wow, suprised wikipedia people haven't deleted this like so many other useful articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.248.244 (talk) 11:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albedo Anthropomorphics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110302031411/http://www.shandafantasyarts.org/albedo.htm to http://www.shandafantasyarts.org/albedo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]