Talk:Aldebaran (song)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 3 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Aldebaran (Ai song) to Aldebaran (song). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 3 May 2022
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per RFC carving out a primary topic exception, where if only one song out of multiple namesake songs has an article, the song with the article has priority for the "(song)" qualifier. A substantial majority of participants agreed with this provision. However, a hatnote to the Enya song should also be made. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Aldebaran (Ai song)". As "Aldebaran (Ai song)" is a completed article, it should be moved to "Aldebaran (song)". -Verso- (talk) 03:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
]
- Support per ]
- Support unless the Enya song is notable, move the redirect to Aldebaran (Enya song). Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)]
- Oppose this may have been number 4 in Japan but the Enya instrumental gets more hits in English print media. No advantage to anyone in removing the name of singer from title in this case. Aldebaran (song) should redirect to dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support per longstanding consensus that there's no need to disambiguate further when there are no other articles about similarly named songs. If an article about the Enya song is created, this article can be moved again at that time. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Relister comment There seems to be a dispute here on whether this RFC or ]
- Oppose per In ictu oculi. Just because there is an article does not make it the primary topic. Since the primary topic can be a subtopic of another article -- 65.92.247.17 (talk) 03:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support as there is only one article about a song. A hatnote after the move will suffice. Tassedethe (talk) 17:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.