Talk:American Football discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Featured listAmerican Football discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on September 10, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 20, 2021Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 19, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that all three albums in the discography of the emo band American Football are eponymous, so the media and Polyvinyl Records refer to them as LP1, LP2, and LP3?

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

American Football performing in 2017
American Football performing in 2017

Created by Guerillero (talk). Self-nominated at 04:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Information is correct and verifiable. Doesn't seem to be any copyright violation. QPQ seems to be in order. Page seems to be long enough. Page was created yesterday so it's definitely new enough. Hook is under 200 characters if formatting is not included and is interesting, although "the media and Polyvinyl Records refers to them" could possibly be replaced with "they are referred to" for the sake of conciseness. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Guerillero, the hook currently has "(pictured)" immediately following a possessive, which makes for awkward reading. Would it be okay if I tweaked it to read:
@MeegsC: That works for me! --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 16:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]