Talk:Amerijet International

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Aviation: Airlines This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met This article is supported by the airline project.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. talk · contribs ) This user has contributed to the article. Jstorlone (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

The WP:COIRESPONSE . Marketing5354 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Amerijet International. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Identifies as an employee here. 96.46.255.196 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Amerijet International. Their editing has included contributions to this article. WHOIS identifies this IP as belonging to Amerijet.

The "Strike" section of this article is clearly biased. The information is only presented from the union members' point of view, with no citations whatsoever to back up the claims being made. 72.145.8.53 (talk) 14:10, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Strike" section is factual based on many news reports of the labor dispute at Amerijet. Here's one of many references: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=c7ad5817-46e8-4999-bac7-afa24454b895 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicargopilot (talk • contribs) 06:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is factually based, then it should be cited. Currently, the sentence, "A a result, the planes began corroding from faecal matter and uric acid caking the interiors, posiibly causing a flight and medical biohazard somewhat worse than those on airlines of developing nations" is cited from a CNN article. This article states nothing of the sorts. Grammatical mistakes and falsifying citations are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Removing this sentence until further citations (and possibly further discussion) is completed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.31.4 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are two new editors involved in an edit war over this content

Live Primate Transport

Amerijet is one of only a few airlines that still transports primates to be used in experimentation. They have transported primates from the islands of Saint Kitts and Barbados, and elsewhere in the Caribbean and South America, to the United States. The shipments were for companies, such as Primate Products, Inc. and Worldwide Primates, that provide primates to laboratories. In August 2009, Amerijet was cited by the USDA for failing to meet federal standards in regards to enclosures holding 15 tamarins. ^[1]

1. ^ http://www.blog.animalrightsflorida.org/?p=915

At the moment it cannot be included - a blog fails

I have Amerijet's USDA citation links here http://acissearch.aphis.usda.gov/LPASearch/faces/LPASearch.jspx; The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) article which lists Amerijet as a primate transporter here http://www.buav.org/article/448/buav%E2%80%99s-cargo-cruelty-campaign-uncovers-new-primate-shipments and finally The National Anti-Vivisection Alliance (Nava) listing of Amerijet here http://www.antivivisection.info/g2h/amerijet.html Will these new references do it? Plato9 (talk) 00:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Plato9[reply]

Antivivisection.info and BUAV seem to be campaign groups. In order to include this text in some form we need it reported in a

talk) 00:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes, that's the pdf. If I have to, I'll edit the article based around the citations listed in the USDA inspections. Plato9 (talk) 00:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Plato9[reply]

OK, well that seems fair enough. The problem now is that the article is not very big, so a large section on this issue will quite rightly draw criticisms of

talk) 01:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Well I've added something. Seems a bit short after all that. Can you add a line or two of balanced information? Bye for now,

talk) 01:31, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Amerijet is no longer at Logan int'l. Where is your new location in Massachusetts? 100.0.164.218 (talk) 20:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]