Talk:Apollonian and Dionysian

Please explain your reasons for inserting it again if you choose to do so. Lapaz 20:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did anyone consider including

Cygnus_X-1_series from Rush_(band)

?

Franciozzy 12:52, 13 April 2011 (BST)

Actually, Schelling used these terms before Nietzsche did. --178.1.3.228 (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does'nt Geschwinde, ihr wirbelnden Winde, BWV 201, deals with this subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.229.5.24 (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that Paglia's conception does not "diverge significantly" from Nietzsche's but is entirely incompatible with his. Given this, some reference as to why he is an "admitted influence" on her would be handy. It's exceeding nonsense in any case... Fbunny (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need for the word 'controversial' on camille paglia's book. any book can be called controversial and it seems to me unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akivaragen (talk • contribs) 18:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Any book can be called controversial' - It's a useful term if it describes how the book is received 81.100.232.181 (talk) 06:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some novelists in the past few years have explicitly dealt with this theme. I'm thinking of adding a mention in an appropriate place in the article. Doctor Whom (talk) 21:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Apollonians include Olympian God Apollo's philosophy/religion (god of logic with rationalist statements attributed) and followers, and those who strive to be logical. Shouldn't that be mentioned/disambiguated (or in own article)?--dchmelik☀️🕉︎☉🦉🐝🐍☤☆(talk 17:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]