Talk:Apple One
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 9 February 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Apple One (service) to Apple One. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 9 February 2022
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 16:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Apple One (service) → Apple One – Apple I, which Apple One currently redirects to, is usually spelled either "Apple I" (with a Roman numeral I) or less commonly "Apple 1" (with an Arabic numeral 1). It is rarely spelled as "Apple One". When readers search for "Apple One", they are looking for the subscription service offered by Apple, not a computer of which only a few hundred units were produced 45 years ago. feminist (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
]
- Support The nominating rationale makes sense -- Apple One is certainly not a ridiculous term for Apple I, and should exist as a hatnote, but its very clear from usage that with this spelling/format it is intended as the subscription service, across news, books and other sourcing. In theory I guess we could argue there is no overwhelming primary topic, but directing readers instead to a dab page feels counterproductive and an intentional hurdle to disrupt reader navigation.--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support I wouldn't be so sure as to which page gets more traffic, but with hat notes on both pages, the move makes sense.--agr (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support. While talk) 01:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)]
- Neutral: I obviously know of Apple I - it is a seminal step in computer history. (I would ask CapnZapp (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)]
- Weak oppose Google does seem to return the service for this term but as mentioned Apple I gets more views (13,228) than the series (1,619)[[1]] and its quite plausible readers will use either term. Instead I'd suggest making this title a DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Compare Android 1.0, with Android 1, being a dab. In my view, Apple 1 is a much more likely search term for the Apple I. In fact. [2]] Apple 1 does receive more views compared to Apple One. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.