Talk:Asilisaurus

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is the skeletal mount bipedal? Aren't silesaurids quadrupedal? 2001:569:782B:7A00:4062:6E7A:101B:16E7 (talk) 03:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Silesaurus itself is often depicted as bipedal, so I guess it has been suggested they could do both, don't know if it is still supported. See for example:[1][2] FunkMonk (talk) 12:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]