Talk:Auckland (National Provincial Championship)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for the discussion (permanent link ) was No merger. |
Requested Move
I am open to debate on what this article should be called, but it is clear that Auckland 1st XV is not the correct name. There are no references to the team which use that name (lets face it, most media merely refer to "Auckland" with the context of the Air NZ cup etc. established elsewhere in the articles). However, there are frequent references to the Auckland 1st XV Competition, which is the premier schools competition in the region. Indeed, I would suggest that school rugby is what the phrase 1st XV immediately brings to mind for most readers. I do agree that there is room for an article about the team as distinct from the ARFU. dramatic (talk) 06:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Jay 07:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)]
- "Auckland representative rugby union team" seems more appropriate still.--talk) 23:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)]
- Of course! dramatic (talk) 02:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Jeff79 and dramatic that "Auckland representative rugby union team" would be better. LunarLander // talk // 15:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)]
Done - Thank you linesmen, thank you ball boys.
Large amounts of text copied from Auckland Rugby Football Union
An ip editor copied a large amount of material from
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090611162413/http://www.aukrugby.co.nz:80/Page.aspx?id=1 to http://www.aukrugby.co.nz/Page.aspx?id=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Merge proposal (September 2020)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was no merge. After discussions here, here and in the past the main consensus is for all the Mitre 10 Cup sides to have separate pages from their unions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
I propose to merge
I actually propose that it remains separate and all other rugby teams should really have separate pages. Rugby Unions are far more than the chief representative teams. They are organisations with numerous club competition grades and histories and with representative playing teams which can go back for over a century. They are also fielding women's representative sides. To try and have it all on one page could create something very cumbersome. User:Yamis
- Thanks @Yamis:, this is also being discussed here. There are some examples on what separate pages would look like and what a tidied singular page would look like also. Thanks. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 11:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Cheers @Rugbyfan22: I've been researching and writing up rugby league in Auckland (have done full season pages from 1908 to 1934) and a bunch of New Zealand rep players so far but I have covered a lot of rugby as well because of players switching codes. When I am linking to representative teams I found it very odd that I had to actually link to some generic 2020 union page rather than the actual team involved in the match (for example if I am linking to the HB rugby team from 1923 the only option is to link it to (essentially) the 2020 HB rugby union). Interesting discussion though as I can see the other argument. I'm just of the opinion that a union is not the same as their representative teams and the histories tied up with them. I think NZ rugby is quite poorly served on wiki at the moment (as is league) and that ultimately more pages, and more detailed pages is better rather than contracting/restricting the existing pages. Thanks (Jamie).
- @Yamis:, it is a weird one. All the Rugby Union pages for the NZ unions are all very poor, with no real sources and lots of random statistics and player tables on them. They're all going to have to be tidied up whatever happens. I just think that nobody in the past has looked after them, whereas SA sides and Australian sides have had people looking after them. So far more people have suggested creating separate pages for the Mitre 10 Cup sides, and I've created drafts for all of them (just stubs at the moment) if there is consensus for that. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Article name
I moved this article back to "Auckland rugby union team" because this conforms to
- Hi @Shudde:, I moved this page to link all the Mitre 10 Cup teams together. Auckland has a number of rugby union teams at differing levels, age groups and women's sides, therefore the originally name isn't entirely suitable. A discussion was held on this talk page, here and here over the whole topic and it was decided that team nicknames weren't suitable for page names either. It also wouldn't be suitable for the disambiguator (rugby union) due to the original union pages, so this was a good all round solution we could come up with. If you think they should be better as something else, feel free to create request moves for all the Mitre 10 Cup pages. Also at Mitre 10 Cup is the clear Common Name for the tournament, people will likely be familiar with it Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)