Talk:Aurunci Mountains

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello there Attlios. I see you have suppressed the TOC, no doubt because the article is currently very short. I would say, tentatively fine. Tentatively. I plan an expansion of course and you can see that I have already started it. As a longer article it might need a TOC. It also needs more photos, but more text would be required for that also. I don't know how long the expansion will take me, and I'm not sure where the TOC threshold is. I'm open to suggestion. We customarily have TOC's but there is some liberty for design. I imagine the design will change a few times. So, I'm just letting you know I'm aware of your design actions and how that might or might not impact the expansion. I suppose the same might be said of the other members of the Volscian Chain and a few other topographic articles concerning the region. I am aiming at Latium and related. Obviously we are just getting started on these. Ciao.Dave (talk) 12:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now sufficient body to have a TOC. When I arrived on the article for the first time just now I was very puzzled by the absence of a TOC. I will restore it.Ludwig Boltzmann (talk) 08:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aurunci Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927174151/http://www.lincei.it/pubblicazioni/rendicontiFMN/rol/pdf/S2000-01-02.pdf to http://www.lincei.it/pubblicazioni/rendicontiFMN/rol/pdf/S2000-01-02.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]