Talk:Avant-Garde and Kitsch

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Literature / Aesthetics / Social and political Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Aesthetics Social and political philosophy Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

A sensible place for this rather brief paragraph would be at Kitsch. Readers would find it there. --Wetman 08:00, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CG's "Avant Garde and Kitsch" needs to be cited (as it is mentioned in the first sentence) and also included in the Source list. I'm having trouble tracking down the page numbers, but we've at least got the journal title and year (Partisan Review, 1939). I think it is volume 6. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.235.43.5 (talk) 23:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha - finally found it and updated the entry. Thank you Google Books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.13.50.52 (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]