Talk:Backbone-dependent rotamer library

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconChemistry Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Predicted quality

The article has a predicted quality of "FA" on the Wikipedia Chemistry Project page. --Math-ghamhainn (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on audience and jargon

  • “This requires smooth probability functions with well behaved derivatives.” - why? (I mean, I know why, it's so the minimizer doesn't get stuck, but I think the article needs to say it)
  • heavy atom - I think this is jargon within our field and we probably can't afford to use it.
  • Scorefunction - there's no target to wikilink this, ouch. (We already knew Rosetta was a problem child here.)

-- stillnotelf talk 21:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conformational isomerism

The wikipedia page on Conformational isomerism had a section on protein rotamer libraries that was removed with the comment that they should have their own page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conformational_isomerism&type=revision&diff=581194590&oldid=581194428 --Math-ghamhainn (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]