Talk:Backbone-dependent rotamer library
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. | ||
This article was accepted from this draft on 19 April 2021 by reviewer Opabinia regalis (talk · contribs). |
Chemistry Mid‑importance | |||||||
|
Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | |
This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance). |
Predicted quality
The article has a predicted quality of "FA" on the Wikipedia Chemistry Project page. --Math-ghamhainn (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Thoughts on audience and jargon
- “This requires smooth probability functions with well behaved derivatives.” - why? (I mean, I know why, it's so the minimizer doesn't get stuck, but I think the article needs to say it)
- heavy atom - I think this is jargon within our field and we probably can't afford to use it.
- Scorefunction - there's no target to wikilink this, ouch. (We already knew Rosetta was a problem child here.)
-- stillnotelf talk 21:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Conformational isomerism
The wikipedia page on Conformational isomerism had a section on protein rotamer libraries that was removed with the comment that they should have their own page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conformational_isomerism&type=revision&diff=581194590&oldid=581194428 --Math-ghamhainn (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)