Talk:Baltimore Museum of Art

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Maryland: Baltimore Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Baltimore Task Force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Saragraceful.

Above undated message substituted from

I have just modified one external link on Baltimore Museum of Art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804052021/http://www.marylandartsource.org:80/institutions/detail_000000014.html to http://www.marylandartsource.org/institutions/detail_000000014.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baltimore Museum of Art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061002143744/http://www.thewalters.org/news_art_museum/pressdetail.aspx?e_id=23 to http://www.thewalters.org/news_art_museum/pressdetail.aspx?e_id=23

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Thinker and 8 Men.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The current text mentions that in 2019 an auction was scheduled to raise money for acquisitions of works of art made by women and artists of color. The purpose of this auction was to "redefine the canon". Some works of these women artists and artists of color represent primarily women and people of color. The creators of the works also being women and people of color, the question may be raised whether they would have made these works if they would not themselves have been in exactly the same categories. Ego art. Of course the reply to such an objection from these 'new canon' artists will be that the present 'canon-driven' collection is also ego art, mainly portraying the lives and concerns of well-to-do white ("privileged") people. But is this true? And is this an argument for selling some works by over-represented white privileged artists to raise money to acquire works not by a criterion of their artistic merit but by a criterion of the nature of their makers: women and artists of color? In this way, the characteristics of a work of art are being confused by the characteristics of their makers. For instance,'a work of art is valuable because it is made by someone who does not have white privilege'. I sense a judgement bias here. --Hansung02 (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]