Talk:Bambi effect
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
|
|
![]() | A fact from Bambi effect appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge and/or Transwiki
This article has sat here as a stub since 2005. There haven't been any substantial edits since the no-consensus AfD in 2007. It seems its time to face the fact that this is a dictionary definition and not much more. I think it should probably be moved over to
- I would add that there had been no talk on this page for the last eight months, which is why I talk) 23:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)]
- I would add that there had been no talk on this page for the last eight months, which is why I
- Endorse redirect MikeHobday (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Clarify?
The term is also found as LGBT slang, where the Bambi effect is used to refer to "the turning of a young (otherwise homosexual) man's fancy to (heterosexual) love [the parting of the youthful Bambi and his erstwhile pal Thumper in the Disney film Bambi
What? --Moni3 (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
It might be relevant to cite the age of the citation on that, because I don't know anyone in the GLBT community, myself included, that recognizes that use. Does anyone know of a recent citation that includes it? I realize that's probably not necessary at wiki, but I still... think it's relevant.--NM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.212.135 (talk) 03:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Whether or not it's relevant, it shouldn't be mentioned in this article, since it's a completely different meaning. This is why we have disambiguation. --NE2 06:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, but it isn't notable enough to stand on its own, and I'd venture to say that given the quote it's based on the same characteristics of human behavior and attraction. More work is to be done here. NM, perhaps you can find out? Drmies (talk) 18:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm moving the section here for now, since it's not used in the same sense as the rest of the article and so doesn't belong in it.--
==LGBT slang== The term is also found inhomosexual) man's fancy to (heterosexual) love [the parting of the youthful Bambi and his erstwhile pal Thumper in the Disney film Bambi (1942)]."[1] In The Gay Report it was described as the effect "where the young males in spring all suddenly turn their attention away from each other towards females with puffy cheeks, red lips, batting eyelashes, etc. - where even Bambi and Thumper don't need each other any more".[2]
Unencyclopedic & POV
The article is written from the obvious POV of uncritical agreement with a hypothetical and not scientifically supported 'effect', which comes across as being more of a jocular, mainstream-media-friendly neologism than a serious hypothesis. The sources (which are not psychological studies) simply use the phrase, they don't perform serious research or study on this purported 'effect'.--
rm non-applicable 'see also' section
==See also== * Bambi Meets Godzilla
It's not sufficiently clear how
rm sentence re acts of hunting
It's unclear why this was included. The reference is "A personal journey", suggesting it's far from being a scientifically sound source.--
Witnessing disturbing acts of hunting can lead to "feeling sympathy for thepredators".[3]
move OR clause with citation here for now
"which would explain..." is totally OR. Also, the attempt to make a connection between attraction to human-baby-like-looking animals and sympathy for "furry or feathered animals"* makes no sense unless you've got a furry or feathered human baby. Sentence moved here for now in case someone wants to try to work the citation back in in a non-OR, etc, way.--
which would explain the sympathy humans feel for furry or feathered animals and their aversion to scaly creatures.[4]
*Originally the sentence appeared as:
- "A secondary meaning is sometimes found in psychology, where the term may be used to refer to a perceived tendency in "humans...to find animals attractive that have characteristics similar to those [of] human babies", which would explain the sympathy humans feel for furry or feathered animals..."
References moved from article to above
- )
- )
- )
- )
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bambi effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060423204000/http://www.zwire.com/site/tab2.cfm?newsid=14062217&BRD=2553&PAG=461&dept_id=506066&rfi=6 to http://www.zwire.com/site/tab2.cfm?newsid=14062217&BRD=2553&PAG=461&dept_id=506066&rfi=6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
To Kill a Mockingbird
I know I ought simply to be bold, but I suspect this has come up before. It seems to me that the famous (eponymous) speech from To Kill a Mockingbird is a very straightforward summary of the Bambi Effect, and therefore would warrant inclusion - maybe even just as a reference or "see also". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:2174:D100:A0D5:3B7C:8032:CF61 (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)