Talk:BatDiv

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / Operation Majestic Titan This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Operation Majestic Titan (Phase V) Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

I think it is interesting that the Pacific Fleet battleships either retained their cage masts (the newer "Big Five" TN CA CO MA WV) or had been modernized (the older NV OK PA AZ) with tripod masts, whereas the combat division in the Atlantic fleet (NM MI ID) had been modernised with tower structures resembling the tower bridges of the Royal Navy Queen Elizabeth class. I believe this implies a lot about 1930s preparations for the gathering storm that became WWII. Naaman Brown (talk) 16:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BatDiv. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100914210138/http://www.usswisconsin.org/General/Ships%20History.htm to http://www.usswisconsin.org/General/Ships%20History.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]